Sustainable Elevator Profile Design: Improving Aerodynamic Efficiency in Experimental Aircraft

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20983/culcyt.2026.1.2e.4

Keywords:

Computational Fluid Dynamics, fuel, elevator, aerodynamic efficiency, airfoil

Abstract

This work focuses on the sustainable design of elevator profiles, aimed at improving aerodynamic efficiency in 28 experimental aircraft in order to reduce fuel consumption and the associated environmental impact. Three aerodynamic profiles (NACA 2412, NACA 0012, and S2050) were compared using simulations on two computational fluid dynamics platforms, evaluating their performance under specific conditions of an experimental aircraft. Analysis of the properties revealed that the NACA 0012 profile offers the highest efficiency, standing out for generating the necessary lift with less drag. The selection of this profile is in line with eco-innovation principles, as greater aerodynamic efficiency means a reduction in the power required and, therefore, lower fuel consumption and pollutant emissions during operation. Although the study did not consider all available profiles, the selection of NACA 0012 constitutes a significant improvement over commonly used alternatives, as it aligns with the objectives of sustainability and resource 36 optimization in experimental aviation. Consequently, the implementation of this profile in the elevator not only promotes a more efficient design, but also drives eco-innovation in the aeronautical sector, contributing significantly to an industry with a lower environmental impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jeannette Abril Nevárez Sánchez, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

Aeronautical Engineering Student, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y Manufactura, Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, México

Arturo Paz Pérez, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

Professor-researcher, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y Manufactura, Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología / Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, México

References

J. Anderson, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 6.ª ed. Nueva York, EUA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2017.

I. Da Riva, “Aerodinámica”, en Curso de Conferencias Sobre Tecnología Aeronáutica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, oct.-dic. 1991.

D. R. Flores, “Diseño de Perfiles Aerodinámicos”, tesis de grado, ESIME, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, 2006.

S. Pinzón, “El Perfil Alar y su Nomenclatura NACA”, Ciencia y Poder Aéreo, vol. 8, n.º 1, pp. 26-32, en.-dic. 2013.

E. G. Paipa-Sanabria, D. Gonzales y J. Coronado, “Understanding Eco-Innovation: A Critical Examination of Theories and Tools for Achieving Societal Sustainability”, J Sustain Res, vol. 7, n.º 1, pp. 1-25, mar. 2025, doi: 10.20900/jsr20250013.

E. E. D. Delarze y E. M. P. Reyes, “Análisis Numérico de la Estabilidad y Control de una Aeronave no Tripulada”, en Mecánica Computacional vol. XXII, ENIEF 2003 - XXII Congreso sobre Métodos Numéricos y sus Aplicaciones, 2003, pp. 1136-1148.

A. I. Carmona, Aerodinámica y Actuaciones del Avión, 10.ª ed. Madrid, España: Paraninfo, 2000.

S. Ravikanth et al., “A Effect of Elevator Deflection on Lift Coefficient Increment”, IJMER, vol. 5, n.º 6, pp. 9-25, 2015.

J. Kentfield, “Lift/Drag Ratios of Aircraft with Outboard Horizontal Stabilizers”, en 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reston, Virgina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, en. 2008, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.2514/6.2008-299.

I. Abrantes, A. F. Ferreira, L. B. Magalhães, M. Costa, y A. Silva, “The impact of revolutionary aircraft designs on global aviation emissions”, Renew Energy, vol. 223, p. 119937, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.119937.

G. Mutanov, Z. Omirbekova, A. A. Shaikh y Z. Issayeva, “Sustainability-Driven Green Innovation: Revolutionising Aerospace Decision-Making with an Intelligent Decision Support System”, Sustainability, vol. 16, n.º 1, p. 41, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16010041.

C. Y. Goh, C. Y. Leow y R. Nordin, “Energy Efficiency of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: A Comparative Study”, Drones, vol. 7, n.º 2, p. 98, 2023, doi: 10.3390/drones7020098.

R. A. Márquez, M. A. Martínez y M. J. Martínez, “Diseño de superficies de control para aeronaves radiocontroladas. Caso: prototipo clase Micro SAE Aero Design”, Rev. Fac. Ing. Univ. Antioquia, n.º 104, pp. 71-82, jul. 2021, doi: 10.17533/udea.redin.20210740.

F. Mohamad y M. Y. Yusri, “Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulations of Wavy Leading Edge NACA0012 Wings”, J. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Aviat., vol. 56, n.º 1S, pp. 477-485, 2024, doi: 10.6125/JoAAA.202403_56(1S).35.

“Airfoil Tools”. airfoiltools.com. Accedido: ag. 19, 2024. [En línea]. Disponible: http://airfoiltools.com

Y. A. Çengel y J. M. Cimbala, Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 1.ª ed. Nueva York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2006.

F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 7.ª ed. McGraw-Hill, 2011.

B. Steenwijk y P. Druetta, “Numerical Study of Turbulent Flows over a NACA 0012 Airfoil: Insights into Its Performance and the Addition of a Slotted Flap”, Appl. Sci., vol. 13, n.º 13, p. 7890, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13137890.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

[1]
J. A. Nevárez Sánchez and A. Paz Pérez, “Sustainable Elevator Profile Design: Improving Aerodynamic Efficiency in Experimental Aircraft”, Cult. Científ. y Tecnol., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. E40-E57, Apr. 2026.

Issue

Section

Ed. Esp. "Estrategia de Gestión para la Transición hacia una Economía Circular"