A pre-pandemic study about recreational uses in the Mexico Park located at Mexico City (year 2017)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20983/decumanus.2022.2.2Keywords:
urban forestry, urban planning, leisure, green areasAbstract
A recreational study was carried out through surveys in the Parque México in Mexico City. For this, the relationship between visit patterns with socioeconomic information, uses and perceptions of visitors with 18 years old or older was analyzed. This research uses descriptive statistics and a non-linear canonical correlation analysis to analyze relationships between variables. An ordered probit regression was also performed to determine the variables that explain the frequency of recreational use. It was obtained that the Park mainly receives visitors with at least bachelor's degree (78.6%) and high incomes (more than 50% have a monthly family income higher than $10,000.00 pesos and 27.6% receive more than $30,000.00 per month). Considering the results, the conclusions are that although the highest percentage of the studied population comes from neighborhoods outside the Roma-Condesa Corridor: then the visitors who live in the Corridor and who have higher incomes, have weight in the description of the model. The results allow to conclude too, that higher income increases the frequency of use. It is also observed that the park is used during the Monday to Friday by more than 50% of the population of visitors and with a high percentage of use in the mornings.
Downloads
References
Aly, D. y Dimitrijevic, B. (2022). Systems approach to the sustainable management of urban public parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 68, 1-10. https://doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127482
Abdelhamid, M. y Elfakharany, M. (2020). Improving urban park usability in developing countries: case study of Al-Shalalat Park in Alexandria. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59, 311-321. https://doi:10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.042
Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis. New Jersey: Wiley.
Alwah, A., Li, W. y Al-Attar, A. (2020). Characteristics of visiting urban open spaces in Sana’a city in Yemen. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 608, 1-10. https://doi:10.1088/1755-1315/608/1/012002
Ayala-Azcárraga, C., Diaz, D. y Zambrano, L. (2019). Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 27–35. https://doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04
Cohen, D., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Derose, K., Martinez, H., Setodji, C. y McKenzie, T. (2010). Parks and physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Preventive Medicine, 50, 9–12. https://doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.020
Cohen, D., Han, B., Nagel, C., Harnik, P., McKenzie, T., Evenson, K., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Vaughan, C. y Katta, S. (2016). The first national study of neighborhood parks. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(4), 419–426. https://doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021
CPRA. (2015). A Framework for Recreation in Canada, 2015. Pathways to Wellbeing. Ottawa: CPRA.
Cranz, G. y Boland, M. (2004). Defining the sustainable park: a fifth model for urban parks. Landscape Journal, 23(2), 102-120. https://doi:10.3368/lj.23.2.102
Crespín, E. (2016). Análisis multivariante: Aplicaciones con SPSS. El Salvador: Instituto de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación y UFG Editores.
Delegación Cuauhtémoc. (2016). Programa delegacional de desarrollo en Cuauhtémoc 2016-2018. Ciudad de México: Delegación Cuauhtémoc.
Delegación Cuauhtémoc. (2017). Atención a solicitud de INFOMEX 0405000248917. Oficio DC/DG5U/1002/2017, 5 de septiembre de 2017. Ciudad de México: INFOMEX.
Escudero, X., Guarner, J., Galindo-Fraga, A., Escudero-Salamanca, M., Alcocer-Gamba, M. y Del Río, C. (2020). La pandemia de coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Situación actual e implicaciones para México. Archivos de cardiología de México, 90(1), 7-14. https://doi:10.24875/acm.m20000064
Esther H., Winky, K. y Edwin H. (2017). Elderly satisfaction with planning and design of public parks in high density old districts: An ordered logit model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 39–53. https://doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.006
Evenson, K., Wen, F., Golinelli, D., Rodríguez, D. y Cohen, D. (2012). Measurement Properties of a Park Use Questionnaire. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 526–547. https://doi:10.1177/0013916512436421
Falcón, A. (2007). Espacios verdes para una ciudad sostenible. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Ferrans, C. (1990). Quality of life: Conceptual issues. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 6(4), 248–254. https://doi:10.1016/0749-2081(90)90026-2
Gehl, J. (2010). Ciudades para la gente. Argentina: Ediciones Infinito.
Gehl, J. y Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. USA: Island Press.
Gómez, J. y Mesa, A. (2015). Análisis de los modos de acceso y los patrones de uso de la población respecto a los espacios verdes urbanos, como base para su planificación. Urbano, 18(32), 38-49. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=19844017005
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, M. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.
Hilbe, J. (2014). Modeling count data. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2020). Mapas. México: INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/mapas/
Jim, C. y Shan, X. (2013). Socioeconomic effect on perception of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China. Cities, 31, 123–131. https://doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.017
Loukaitou, A. (1995). Urban form and social context: cultural differentiation in the uses of urban parks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(2), 89–102. https://doi:10.1177/0739456x9501400202
Mak, B. y Jim, C. (2019). Linking park users’ socio-demographic characteristics and visit-related preferences to improve urban parks. Cities, 92, 97–111. https://doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.008
Marquet, O., Hipp, J., Alberico, C., Huang, J., Fry, D., Mazak, E., Lovasi, G. y Floyd, M. (2019). Use of SOPARC to assess physical activity in parks: do race/ethnicity, contextual conditions, and settings of the target area, affect reliability? BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1-11. https://doi:10.1186/s12889-019-8107-0
Mayen, C. y Utomo, A. (2021). Evaluating the association between urban green spaces and subjective well-being in Mexico city during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health & Place, 70, 1-11. https://doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102606
Meulman, J. y Heiser, W. (2010). IBM SPSS Categories 19. USA: SPSS Inc. e IBM Company.
Munguía, G. (2016). Percepción sobre las áreas verdes de los residentes de la Colonia Hipódromo, Delegación Cuauhtémoc, Ciudad de México. Tesis de Maestría. Ciudad de México: IPN. Recuperado de https://tesis.ipn.mx/handle/123456789/20591
Özgüner, H. (2011). Cultural differences in attitudes towards urban parks and green spaces. Landscape Research, 36(5), 599–620. https://doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.560474
Pérez, C. (2013). SPSS. Componentes principales, análisis factorial, correspondencias y escalamiento. USA: ICG.
Peschardt, K. y Stigsdotter, U. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26–39. https://doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12
Ramírez, V. (2005). El Parque México. Génesis y trascendencia. Valoración patrimonial de un espacio público abierto. Tesis de Licenciatura. Ciudad de México: UNAM. http://132.248.9.195/pd2006/0604070/0604070.pdf
Ramírez, G. y Ramírez B. (2006). Colinealidad y mínimos cuadrados ponderados. Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura, 12(1), 283-296. http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_ac/article/view/10630
Ramlee, M., Omar, D., Mohd, R. y Samadi, Z. (2016). Successful attractions of public space through users perception. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 1(2), 188-196. https://doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v1i2.268
Sánchez-Villena, A. y De la Fuente-Figuerola, V. (2020). COVID-19: cuarentena, aislamiento, distanciamiento social y confinamiento, ¿son lo mismo? [Carta al Editor]. Anales de Pediatría, 93(1), 73-74. https://doi:10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.05.001
Scopelliti, M., Carrus, G., Adinolfi, C., Suarez, G., Colangelo, G., Lafortezza, R., Pano, A. y Sanesi, G. (2016). Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 139–148. https://doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.002
Scott, J. y Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
Sepúlveda, R. (2008). Valoración económica del Parque Ronda del Sinú, en Montería, Colombia. Semestre Económico, 11(22), 67-90. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=165013112003
Shijie, G., Jiaming F., Xiao, R. y Linlin, D. (2022) Importance–performance analysis and improvement of an urban park’s cultural ecosystem services based on users’ perspectives: A Beijing case study, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1-15. https://doi:0.1080/13467581.2022.2049800
Skevington, S. y Böhnke, J. (2018). How is subjective well-being related to quality of life? Do we need two concepts and both measures? Social Science & Medicine, 206, 22–30. https://doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.005
Talal, M. y Santelmann, M. (2021). Visitor access, use, and desired improvements in urban parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63, 1-14. https://doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127216
Valderrey, P. (2015). Modelos predictivos avanzados con STATA. Modelos logit, probit y tobit, paneles y modelos multidimensionales. España: CIP.
Yazici, A., Ögüs, E., Ankarali, H. y Gürbüz, F. (2010). An application of nonlinear canonical correlation analysis on medical data. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 40(1), 1-8. https://doi:10.3906/sag-0803-47
Zhai, Y., Li, D., Wang, D. y Shi, C. (2020). Seniors’ Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks and Park Design Characteristics. Frontiers in Public Health, 8: 1-13. https://doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00322
Zhang, S. y Zhou, W. (2018). Recreational visits to urban parks and factors affecting park visits: Evidence from geotagged social media data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 27–35. https://doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 DECUMANUS. REVISTA INTERDISCIPLINARIA SOBRE ESTUDIOS URBANOS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.