Cualidades restauradoras de sitios culturales y antiguos del centro histórico de la ciudad de Guanajuato
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20983/decumanus.2024.1.8Keywords:
Restorative potential, restorative qualities, built environmentsAbstract
En la presente investigación se identificó el potencial y cualidades restauradoras (fascinación, estar alejado, compatibilidad, coherencia y alcance) de trece escenarios de la ciudad de Guanajuato, México, divididos en tres categorías (templos de adoración, lugares históricos, y plazuelas y callejones). Mediante muestreo no probabilístico accidental participaron sesenta y nueve personas quienes respondieron in situ una versión adaptada a dispositivos móviles de la Escala de Percepción de Restauración Ambiental (EPRA-R) para identificar el potencial y cualidades restauradoras de cada escenario. Se encontró que los templos de adoración fueron evaluados como más restauradores que los lugares históricos y las plazuelas y callejones, respectivamente. Las cualidades fascinación y alcance fueron las de mayor impacto en templos de adoración y lugares históricos, mientras que coherencia y compatibilidad lo fueron en las plazuelas y callejones. Limitaciones incluyen la falta de uniformidad en el sexo de los participantes y el tamaño reducido de la muestra. Se discute la relevancia del estudio sobre cualidades restauradoras en ambientes construidos y sus beneficios psicoambientales.
References
Berto, R. (2007). Assessing the restorative value of the environment: A study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 42(5), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590601000590
Bilotta, E., y Evans, G. W. (2013). Environmental Stress. En L. Steg, A. E. Van den Berg, & J. I. De Groot M. (Eds.), Environmental Psychology: An Introduction (pp. 27-35). BPS Blackwell.
Bonnes, M., Scopelliti, M., Fornara, F., y Carrus, G. (2013). Urban Environmental Quality. En L. Steg, A. E. van Den Berg, & J. I. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental Psychology: an Introduction (pp. 97-106). BPS Blackwell.
Burnard, M. D., y Kutnar, A. (2015). Wood and human stress in the built environment: a review. Wood Science and Technology, 49(5), 969-986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0747-3
Coburn, A., Kardan, O., Kotabe, H., Steinberg, H., Steinberg, J., Hout, M. C., Robbins, A., MacDonald, J., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., y Berman, M. G. (2019). Psychological responses to natural patterns in architecture. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (62), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.007
Fischl, G., y Gärling, A. (2008). Identification, visualization, and evaluation of a restoration-supportive built environment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 25(3), 254-269. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030839
Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Rojas-Rueda, D., Plàsencia, A., y Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2016). Residential green spaces and mortality; A systematic review. Environment International, 86, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.013
Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., y Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14(4), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730435
Hartig, T. (2016). Restorative Environments. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology(February 2016), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05699-6
Hata D., T., Hanyu, K., y Kawata, M. (2014). Can home heal worn-out parents? Japanese Psychological Research, 56(4), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12063
Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A., Hicks, A. M., y Gilson, E. A. (2011). Preference and Tranquility for Houses of Worship. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 504-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511410422
Huang, Q. Y., Jane, H.-a., Li, S., y Bauer, N. (2020). Trees, grass, or concrete? The effects of different types of environments on stress reduction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 193, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103654
Kaplan, R., y Kaplan, S. (1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., y Ryan, R. L. (1998). With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Island Press.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
Lorenzo, E., Corraliza, J. A., Collado, S., y Sevillano, V. (2016). Preference, restorativeness and perceived environmental quality of small urban spaces. Psychology, 7(2), 152-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2016.1149985
Marselle, M. R., Bowler, D. E., Watzema, J., Eichenberg, D., Kirsten, T., y Bonn, A. (2020). Urban street tree biodiversity and antidepressant prescriptions. Scientific Reports, 1, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79924-5
Martínez-Roldán, N., y Goytia-Goyenechea, L. (2020). Huella minera en la ciudad de Guanajuato (México) entre los siglos XVI-XIX: morfología urbana y planimetría en el archivo de Indias en Sevilla (España). Contexto, 14(21), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.29105/contexto14.21-4
Martínez-Soto, J. (2016). Restauración Psicológica: Aportaciones teóricas, metodológicas y empíricas. En J. J. Paulín L., & A. M. Aguado H. (Eds.), Temáticas Actuales en Psicología (pp. 363-394). Editorial Universitaria.
Martínez-Soto, J., y López-Lena, M. M. (2010). Percepción de Cualidades Restauradoras y Preferencia Ambiental. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 27(2), 183-190.
Martínez-Soto, J., Gonzales-Santos, L., Barrios, F. A., y Montero-López Lena, M. E. (2014). Affective and Restorative Valences for Three Environmental Categories. En Perceptual and Motor Skills (pp. 901-923). https://doi.org/10.2466/24.50.PMS.119c29z4
Martínez-Soto, J., López-Lena, M. M., y de la Roca, C. J. (2016). Efectos Psicoambientales de las Áreas Verdes en la Salud Mental. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 50(2), 204-214.
Martínez-Soto, J., de la Fuente-Suárez, L.A., y Ruiz-Corres, S. (2021). Exploring the Links Between Biophilic and Restorative Qualities of Exterior and Interior Spaces in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico. Front. Psychol. 12, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717116
Menatti, L., Subiza-Pérez, M., Villalpando-Flores, A., Vozmediano, L., y San Juan, C. (2019). Place attachment and identification as predictors of expected landscape restorativeness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (63), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.005
Mohamed, A. A. (2017). Further step beyond green- From distractive, to balance, towards restorative built environment. HBRC Journal, (13)3, 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.11.001
Nasar, J. L., y Terzano, K. (2010). The desirability of views of city skylines after dark. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.007
Nordh, H., y Østby, K. (2013). Pocket parks for people - A study of park design and use. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.003
Ouellette, P., Kaplan, R., y Kaplan, S. (2005). The monastery as a restorative environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.06.001
Ruiz-Correa, S., Hernandez-Huérfano, E. E., Álvarez-Rivera, L., Islas-López, V., Ramírez-Sánchez, V., González-Abundes, M., Hernández-Castañeda, E., Carrillo Sánchez, R., Hasimoto-Beltrán y Plata Ortega, I. (2018). UrBis: A Mobile Crowdsourcing Platform for Sustainable Social and Urban Research in Mexico. En W. Leal F., R. Noyola-Cherpitel, P. Medellín-Milán, & V. Ruiz V. (Eds.), Sustainable Development Research and Practice in Mexico and Selected Latin America Countries (pp. 19-37). Springer.
Ruiz-Correa, S., Santani, D., Ramirez-Salazar, B., Ruiz-Correa, I., Rendon-Huerta, F. A., Olmos-Carrillo, C., Sandoval-Mexicano, B. C., Arcos-García, A. H., Hasimoto-Beltrán, R., y Gatica-Perez, D. (2017). SenseCityVity: mobile crowdsourcing, urban awareness, and collective action in Mexico. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 16(2), 44 – https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2017.32
Scopelliti, M., Carrus, G., y Bonaiuto, M. (2019). Is it really nature that restores people? A comparison with historical sites with high restorative potential. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (January 2019), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02742
Stevens, P. (2014). Affective priming of perceived environmental restorativeness. International Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12016
Stigsdotter, U. K., Corazon, S. S., Sidenius, U., Kristiansen, J., y Grahn, P. (2017). It is not all bad for the grey city - A crossover study on physiological and psychological restoration in a forest and an urban environment. Health & Place, 46, 145-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.007
Subiza-Pérez, M., Korpela, K., y Pasanen, T. (2021). Still not that bad for the grey city: A field study on the restorative effects of built open urban places. Cities, 111(April 2021), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103081
Tenngart Ivarsson, C., y Hagerhall, C. M. (2008). The perceived restorativeness of gardens - Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 7(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2008.01.001
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment. En I. Altman, y J. Wohlwill (Edits.), Human Behavior and Environment (págs. 85-125). New York: Plenum.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., y Zelson, M. (1991). Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
Winkel, G., Saegert, S., y Evans, G. (2009). An Ecological Perspective on Theory, Methods, and Analysis: Advances and Challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 29, 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.005
World Health Organization. (2016). Urban green spaces and health- A review of evidence. Recuperado el 27 de Noviembre de 2017, de https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/345751/WHO-EURO-2016-3352-43111-60341-eng.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Xu, J. H., Zhu, L. Y., & Wang, H. B. (2018). Research Characteristics and Status on Environmental Psychology: a bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 38(01020). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183801020
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Decumanus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
