Grounded theory in social research: experience in a sociocultural health study

Main Article Content

Maria del Carmen Castro Vasquez
Carmen Arellano

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the process of theory building based on Grounded Theory, from the analysis of empirical data on the right to health information (RHI) in the detection and medical care of breast and cervical cancer. These data derive from qualitative research, in which focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted with women between 25 and 45 years of age in a city in northern Mexico, to find out how they exercised the DIS in medical care, what their experiences in management were and what their perceptions of care were like. In the analysis of the first data and at the beginning of the open coding, self-perception was identified as an emerging category, defined as the interviewees' self-perception of their position vis-à-vis the physician and the health institution during the management of care. This category was analyzed in axial and selective coding, showing its explanatory potential for understanding the practices of women in exercising their right to health information. This empirical exercise shows that grounded theory implies a systematic and rigorous process of codification, comparison and integration of data and theory. This paper contributes to the understanding of theoretical and methodological decisions based on grounded theory in social research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Castro Vasquez, M. del C., & Arellano Gálvez, M. del C. (2024). Grounded theory in social research: experience in a sociocultural health study. Noesis. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 33(66), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.20983/noesis.2024.2.1
Section
Social Sciences
Author Biography

Maria del Carmen Castro Vasquez, Centro de Estudios en Salud y Sociedad, El Colegio de Sonora

Sociologist, Doctor in Political and Social Sciences from UNAM. Professor-Researcher at the Center
for Studies in Health and Society, of El Colegio de Sonora. She belonged to the National System
of Researchers, Level I (2008-2020). She has the Prodep Recognition as a Full-Time Professor with
a Desirable Profile. She has belonged to the El Colson plant since 1996, and has the category
of "C" Owner. She has been director of master's and doctoral thesis. She has published articles in
indexed journals and of dissemination; books and book chapters. Her areas of interest are citizenship,
gender and health rights, reproductive health and women's cancers, older people, health promotion,
and chronic diseases, from a sociocultural perspective.

References

Aguila, J. (2021). Teoría fundamentada: construcción de datos sobre educación sexual desde las Epistemologías del Sur. Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, 27(53), 163-183.

Alatorre, E. (1998). Las mujeres y el derecho a la salud. Revista Mexicana de Justicia, (4), 51-56.

Bran, L., Valencia, A., Palacios, L., Gómez, S., Acevedo, Y. & Arias, C. (2020). Barreras de acceso del sistema de salud colombiano en zonas rurales: percepciones de usuarios del régimen subsidiado. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud, 25(2), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2020.25.2.6

Calafell, N. (2019). La ginecología natural en América Latina: un movimiento sociocultural del presente. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad Revista Latinoamericana, (33), 59-78. DOI: 10.1590/1984-6487.sess.2019.33.04.a

Campo, M. & Labarca, C. (2009). La teoría fundamentada en el estudio empírico de las representaciones sociales: un caso sobre el rol orientador del docente. Opción, 25(60), 41-54.

Cano, F. (2001). Percepciones de la medicina y el derecho. UNAM.

Cano, F. (2010). Derecho a la protección a la salud en América Latina. Centro Interamericano de Estudios de Seguridad Social.

Castillo, P., Vallejo, E., Cotes, K. & Castañeda, C. (2017). Salud materna indígena en mujeres Nasa y Misak del Cauca, Colombia: tensiones, subordinación y diálogo intercultural entre dos sistemas médicos. Saúde e Sociedade, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902017168743

Castro, C. (2016). En letras chiquitas. Construcción de ciudadanía y el derecho a la información en salud. El Colegio de Sonora.

Castro, C. & Aranda, P. (2020). Mexican Women and decision making in health: the practical sense. En X. Bada y L. Rivera (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Latin America (1-20). Oxford University Press.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.

Charmaz, K. (2020). With constructivist grounded theory you can’t hide: Social justice research and critical inquiry in the public sphere. Qualitative Inquiry 26 (2):165–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419879081

Espinoza, M., Fernández, O. M., Riquelme, N. & Irarrázaval, M. (2019). La identidad transgénero en la adolescencia chilena: experiencia subjetiva del proceso. Psykhe, 28(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.28.2.1425

Estrada, R., Arzuaga, M., Giraldo, C. & Cruz, F. (2021). Diferencias en el análisis de datos desde distintas versiones de la teoría fundamentada. EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales, (51), 185-229. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.51.2021.30812

Fernández, O., Espinosa, H. D., Krause, M., Altimir, C., Mantilla, C., Paz, C. & Fernández-Álvarez, J. (2022). Personal experience of Latin American therapists on their clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies in Psychology, 43(3), 609-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2022.2133456

Flick, U. (2018). Doing grounded theory. Sage Publications.

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.

Hamui, A. & Varela, M. (2013). La técnica de grupos focales. Investigación en educación médica, 2(5), 55-60.

Jiménez, R., García, E. & Cardeñoso, J. (2017). Teoría fundamenta: estrategia para la generación teórica desde datos empíricos. Campo Abierto. Revista de Educación, 36(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.17398/0213-9529.36.1.29

Kenny, M. & Fourie, R. (2015). Contrasting classic, straussian, and constructivist grounded theory: methodological and philosophical conflicts. Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270-1289. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2251

López, L., Leal, S. & Giraldo, L. (2016). Situación del adulto mayor como usuario de internet, en relación a su red personal primaria, con parientes migrantes en Quindío- Colombia. Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 25(49-1). https://doi.org/10.20983/noesis.2016.12.6

Moctezuma, G. (2000). Derechos de los usuarios de los servicios de salud. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas. https://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx/bjv/id/80

O’ Connor, A., Carpenter, B. & Coughlan, B. (2019). An exploration of key issues in the debate between classic and constructivist grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 17(1), 90-103.

Pérez, B., Sagner, J. & Elgueta, H. (2020). Despenalización del aborto en Chile: una aproximación mixta desde la percepción del aborto en población comunitaria. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34(5), 485-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.11.004

Qureshi, H. & Ünlü, Z. (2020). Beyond the paradigm conflicts: a four-step coding instrument for grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920928188

Rocha, M., Santiago, S. & Andrade, W. (2022). (Re) descobrindo a teoria fundamentada para a pesquisa em enfermagem: reflexões sobre a vertente relativista. Revista Enfermagem UERJ, 30(1), e67003-e67003. https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2022.67003

Rodríguez, K., Rodríguez, A. & Agoff, C. (2023). Acoso y hostigamiento sexual en universitarias: emociones ante estas formas de violencia de género y su afrontamiento. Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 32(63). https://doi.org/10.20983/noesis.2023.1.2

Santos, J., Cunha, K., Adamy, E., Backes, M., Leite, J. & Sousa, F. (2018). Data analysis: comparison between the different methodological perspectives of the grounded theory. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP, 52, e03303. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017021803303

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia.

Taylor, S. & Bogdan, R. (1996). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación: la búsqueda de significados. Paidós.

Tena, C., Ruelas, J., Sánchez, A., Rivera, A., Moctezuma, G., Manuel, A., Ramírez, A. & Casares, L. (2002). Derechos de los pacientes en México. Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 40(6), 523-529.

Valles, M. (2024). Awareness of Ageism While Researching Multiple Minority Discrimination: A Discourse and Grounded Theory Analysis Revisiting Own Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(3-4), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221144068

Vander, K. (2022). What is ‘theory’ in grounded theory? Grounded Theory Review. An International Journal, 21(2). https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2022/12/31/what-is-theory-in-grounded-theory/

Wilson, K. (2004). Relating the categories in grounded theory analysis: using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix. The Qualitative Report, 9(1), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2004.1940

Wilson, K. & Howell, D. (2008). Clarifying analysis and interpretation in grounded theory: using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700201